38. Financial instruments

Overview

Cyfrowy Polsat S.A. Group has exposure to the following risks from its use of financial instruments:

  • credit risk,
  • liquidity risk,
  • market risk:
    • currency risk,
    • interest rate risk.

The Group’s risk management policies are designed to reduce the impact of any adverse conditions on the Group’s results.

The Management Board has overall responsibility for the oversight and management of the risks that the Group is subjected to in its activities. Therefore, the Management Board has established an overall risk management framework as well as specific risk management policies with respect to market, credit and liquidity risks.

This note presents information about the Group’s exposure to each of the above risks, the Group’s objectives, policies and processes for measuring and managing risk. Further quantitative disclosures are also included throughout these consolidated financial statements.

Bank loans, bonds, cash, foreign exchange call options, forwards, interest rate swaps and short-term bank deposits are the main financial instruments used by the Group, with the intention of securing the financing for the Group’s activities. The Group also holds other financial instruments including trade receivables and payables, payables relating to purchases of programming rights and payables relating to purchases of tangible and intangible assets which arise in the course of its business activities.

Financial assetsCarrying amount
 31 December 2016 31 December 2015
Loans and receivables, including:3,397.43,300.6
Loans granted51.847.9
Trade and other receivables from related parties12.564.5
Trade and other receivables from third parties1,996.41,664.5
Cash and cash equivalents1,326.01,512.0
Restricted cash10.711.7
Hedging derivative instruments1,5-
Interest rate swaps1,5-
Derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments14.717.4
Forward transactions-10.5
Interest rate swaps14.76.9
Financial liabilitiesCarrying amount
 31 December 2016 31 December 2015
Other financial liabilities measured at amortized cost, including:14,464.614,292.8
Finance lease liabilities25.925.2
Loans and borrowings10,572.76,610.7
Bonds1,878.15,752.0
UMTS license liabilities695.5769.8
Trade and other payables to third parties and deposits573.9510.0
Trade and other payables to related parties12.130.6
Accruals706.4594.5
Hedging derivative instruments-8.3
Interest rate swaps-8.3
Derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments-64.6
Forward transactions-33.3
Interest rate swaps-31.3

Credit risk

Credit risk is defined as the risk that counterparties of the Group will not be able to meet their contractual obligations. Exposure to credit risk is related to three main areas:

  • the creditworthiness of the customers with whom physical sale transactions are undertaken,
  • the creditworthiness of the financial institutions (banks/brokers) with whom, or through whom, hedging or other derivative transactions are undertaken,
  • the creditworthiness of the entities in which investments are made, or whose securities are purchased.

The Group’s exposure to credit risk is associated primarily with trade receivables. The Parent’s customer base includes a large number of individual subscribers who are dispersed geographically over the entire country, and who are required to prepay their subscription fees. Receivables from Parent’s sales network are covered with commission liabilities or deposits. Receivables from subscribers are continuously monitored and recovery actions are taken, including blocking of the signal transferred to subscribers or termination of services to a telephony client and Internet customer. Telewizja Polsat and its subsidiaries provide services with deferred payment which may cause the risk of delays. Assessment of the creditworthiness of the counterparties is regularly carried out and in principle the company does not require security in relation to the financial assets. Polkomtel’s customer base is dispersed geographically over the entire country. In case of important postpaid clients services are rendered following positive credit approval while in case of individual retail clients the verification process is automatized and based on IT-supported customer relationship management system and characteristics of the billing systems. Receivables from Polkomtel’s sales network are continuously monitored; sales limits and utilization limits are used.

The Group pursues a credit policy under which credit risk exposure is constantly monitored.

Due to diversification of risk in terms of the nature of individual entities, their geographical location and cooperation with highly-rated financial institutions, also taking into consideration the fair value of liabilities arising from derivative transactions, the Group is not materially exposed to credit risk as a result of derivative transactions entered into.

The carrying amount of financial assets represents the maximum credit exposure. The maximum exposure to credit risk as at the reporting date was as follows:

Maximum exposure to credit risk

 Carrying amount
 31 December 2016 31 December 2015
Loans granted51.847.9
Trade and other receivables from third parties12.564.5
Trade and other receivables from related parties1,996.41,664.5
Cash and cash equivalents1,326.01,512.0
Restricted cash10.711.7
Derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments:14.717.4
Forward transactions-10.5
Interest rate swaps14.76.9
Total3,412.13,318.0

The concentration of credit risk for trade and other receivables is presented in the tables below:

 Carrying amount
 31 December 201631 December 2015
Receivables from subscribers1,232.0906.1
Receivables from media companies238.7221.0
Receivables from satellite and cable operators21.213.7
Roaming and interconnect receivables166.9177.3
Receivables from distributors121.6153.2
Receivables and loans granted to related parties63.9112.2
Other receivables and loans granted to third parties216.4193.4
Total2,060.71,776.9
 Carrying amount
 31 December 2016 31 December 2015 
Company A44.054.4
Company B29.531.4
Company C25.328.9
Company D22.821.0
Company E21.918.6
Other1,917.21,622.6
Total2,060.71,776.9

Note: for each year 5 largest debtors are presented, not necessarily the same entities in both periods.

The ageing of trade and other receivables at the reporting date was:

31 December 201631 December 2015
 GrossImpairmentNetGrossImpairmentNet
Not past due1,703.629.91,673.71,381.023.91,357.1
Past due 0-30 days216.44.8211.6192.26.0186.2
Past due 31-60 days86.24.981.384.37.077.3
Past due more than 60 days158.564.494.1232.776.4156.3
Total2,164.7104.02,060.71,890.2113.31,776.9

Credit quality of such not overdue receivables that are not impaired is very good.

Trade and other receivables with recognized impairment include not past due and past due trade and other receivables where partial recoverability is estimated. Usually impairment is recognized for trade and other receivables past due for more than 60 days or for trade and other receivables for which impairment indicator exists.

Liquidity risk

The Group’s objective in liquidity management is to ensure that it always has sufficient funds to meet its liabilities when due. Any surplus cash is invested mainly into bank deposits.

The Group prepares, on an ongoing basis, analyses and forecasts of its cash requirements based on projected cash flows.

The following are the contractual maturities of the Group’s financial liabilities.

 31 December 2016
 Carrying amountContractual cash flows6 months and less6-12 months1-2 years2-5 yearsOver 5 years
Loans and borrowings10,572.711,716.9637.8659.01,371.09,049.1-
Bonds1,878.12,739.921.621.443.11,129.41,524.4
UMTS license liabilities695.5756.5-123.9123.9371.7137.0
Finance lease liabilities25.927.73.02.89.712.2-
Trade and other payables to third parties and deposits573.9573.9573.9----
Trade and other payables to related parties12.112.112.1----
Accruals706.4706.4706.4----
Hedging derivative instruments:       
IRS*-------
Derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments:       
IRS*-------
Forward transactions  
– inflows- -------
– outflows ------
 14,464.616,533.41,954.8807.11,547.710,562.41,661.4

* pursuant to the agreements settlements shall be on a net basis

 31 December 2015
 Carrying amountContractual cash flows6 months and less6-12 months1-2 years2-5 yearsOver 5 years
Loans and borrowings6,610.78,603.2(3,883.8)**642.41,336.310,508.3-
Bonds5,752.06,018.74,783.8**21.385.41,128.2-
UMTS license liabilities769.8848.0-119.3119.3358.0251.4
Finance lease liabilities25.226.52.42.44.916.8-
Trade and other payables to third parties and deposits510.0510.0510.0----
Trade and other payables to related parties30.630.630.6----
Accruals594.5594.5594.5----
Hedging derivative instruments:       
IRS*8.36.64.42.2---
Derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments:       
IRS*31.330.730.7----
Forward transactions33.3-
– inflows- -(2,411.7)(2,411.7)----
– outflows 2,446.72,446.7----
 14,365.716,668.82,107.6787.61,545.912,011.3251.4

* pursuant to the agreements settlements shall be on a net basis
** planned earlier redemption of Notes financed using the funds made available under the PLK Term Facility

Market risk

The Group has an active approach to managing its market risk exposure. The objectives of market risk management are:

  • to limit fluctuations in profit/loss before tax,
  • to increase the probability of meeting budget assumptions,
  • to maintain the healthy financial condition and
  • to support the process of undertaking strategic decisions relating to investing activity, with attention to sources of capital for this activity.

All the market risk management objectives should be considered as a whole, while their realisation is dependant primarily upon the internal situation and market conditions.

The Group applies an integrated approach to market risk management. This means a comprehensive approach to the whole spectrum of identified market risks, rather than to each of them individually. The primary technique for market risk management is the use in the Group of hedging strategies involving derivatives. Apart from this, natural hedging is also used to the extent available.

All of the potential hedging strategies and the selection of those preferred reflect the following factors: the nature of identified market risk exposures of the Group, the suitability of instruments to be applied and the cost of hedging, current and forecasted market conditions. In order to mitigate market risk, derivatives are primarily used. The Group transacts only those derivatives for which it has the ability to assess their value internally, using standard pricing models appropriate for a particular type of derivative, and also these which can be traded without significant loss of value with a counterparty other than the one with whom the transaction was initially entered into. In evaluating the market value of a given instrument, the Group relies on information obtained from particular market leading banks, brokers and information services.

It is permitted to use the following types of instruments:

  • Swaps (IRS/CIRS),
  • Forwards and futures,
  • Options.

Currency risk

One of the main risks that the Group is exposed to is currency risk resulting from fluctuations in exchange rate of the Polish zloty against other currencies. Revenues generated by the Group are denominated primarily in the Polish zloty, while a portion of operating costs and capital expenditures are incurred in foreign currencies. The Parent’s currency risk is associated mainly to royalties to TV and radio broadcasters (USD and EUR), transponder capacity leases (EUR), fees for conditional access system (EUR) and purchases of reception equipment and accessories for reception equipment (USD and EUR). After the purchase of Telewizja Polsat Sp. z o.o. currency risk exposure is also associated to purchases of foreign programming licences (USD). After the purchase of Metelem Holding Company Ltd. currency risk exposure is also associated to UMTS license liabilities (EUR), agreements with suppliers of stock, mainly mobile phones, and suppliers of telecommunication network equipment (EUR), roaming and interconnect agreements and some agreements concerning rental of space required for network locations and rental of office space (various currencies). Furthermore, acquisition of Metelem Holding Company Ltd. resulted in risk exposure related to EUR- and USD-denominated bonds.

In respect of licence fees and transponder capacity leases, the Group partly reduces its currency risk exposure by means of an economic hedge as it denominates receivables from signal broadcast and marketing services in foreign currencies.

The Group does not hold any assets held for trading denominated in foreign currencies.

The Group’s exposure to foreign currency was as follows based on currency amounts:

 31 December 2016
 EURUSDCHFGBPSEKXDR
Trade receivables5.84.5 -0.5-0.4
Cash and cash equivalents3.318.01.10.41.5-
UMTS license liabilities(157.2)-----
Trade payables(5.1)(16.6)---(0.6)
Gross balance sheet exposure(153.2)5.91.10.91.5(0.2)
Forward transactions - - ---
Net exposure(153.2)5.91.10.91.5(0.2)
 31 December 2015
 EURUSDCHFGBPSEKXDR
Trade receivables9.48.4 ---0.5
Cash and cash equivalents9.79.71.90.12.5-
Senior Notes(569.1)(524.2)----
UMTS license liabilities(180.6)-----
Trade payables(3.6)(14.0)-(0.1)-(0.9)
Gross balance sheet exposure(734.2)(520.1)1.9-2.5(0.4)
Forward transactions390.9482.1 ---
Net exposure(343.3)(38.0)1.9-2.5(0.4)

The following foreign exchange rates were applied in the presented periods:

 Average rateRates at the reporting date
(in PLN)2016201531 December 201631 December 2015
1 EUR4.36254.18394.42404.2615
1 USD3.94313.77014.17933.9011
1 GBP5.34315.76375.14455.7862
1 CHF4.00213.92004.11733.9394
1 XDR5.48055.27495.67165.4092
1 SEK0.46110.44740.46190.4646
1 AUD2.93302.83523.01802.8546

For the purposes of the exchange rate sensitivity analysis as at 31 December 2016 and 31 December 2015, exchange rate volatility in the +/- 5% range was assumed as probable. This analysis assumes that all other variables, in particular interest rates, remain constant.

   2016 2015 
 As at31 December 2016Estimated change in exchange ratein %Estimated change in profit in PLNEstimated change in other comprehensive income in PLNAs at31 December 2015Estimated change in exchange ratein %Estimated change in profit in PLNEstimated change in other comprehensive income in PLN
 in currency in PLN   in currency in PLN   
Trade receivables          
EUR5.825.85%1.3-9.440.25%2.0-
USD4.518.85%0.9-8.432.75%1.6-
XDR0.42.35%0.1-0.52.65%0.1-
GBP0.52.65%0.1---5%--
Cash and cash equivalents         
EUR3.314.65%0.7-9.741.25%2.1-
USD18.075.25%3.8-9.737.95%1.9-
CHF1.14.75%0.2-1.97.35%0.4-
GBP0.41.95%0.1-0.10.15%--
SEK1.50.75%--2.51.15%0.1-
Senior Notes          
EUR--5%--(569.1)(2,425.2)5%(121.3)-
USD--5%--(524.2)(2,045.0)5%(102.3)-
UMTS license liabilities        
EUR(157.2)(695.5)5%(34.8)-(180.6)(769.6)5%(38.5)-
Trade payables         
EUR(5.1)(22.6)5%(1.1)-(3.6)(15.3)5%(0.8)-
USD(16.6)(69.4)5%(3.5)-(14.0)(54.7)5%(2.7)-
XDR(0.6)(3.2)5%(0.2)-(0.9)(4.9)5%(0.2)-
CHF--5%--(0.1)(0.2)5%--
Change in operating profit  (32.4)-   (257.6)-
Forwards-
EUR--5%--390.91,665.85%83.3-
USD--5%-482.11,880.75%94.0-
Income tax6.215.3-
Change in net profit(26.2)(65.0)-

 

2016

 

2015

 

 

As at
31 December 2016

Estimated change in exchange rate
in %

Estimated change in profit

in PLN

Estimated change in other comprehensive income

in PLN

As at
31 December 2015

Estimated change in exchange rate
in %

Estimated change in profit

in PLN

Estimated change in other comprehensive income

in PLN

 

in currency

in PLN

in currency

in PLN

Trade receivables 

   

 

    

 

EUR

5.8

25.8

-5%

(1.3)

-

9.4

40.2

-5%

(2.0)

-

USD

4.5

18.8

-5%

(0.9)

-

8.4

32.7

-5%

(1.6)

-

XDR

0.4

2.3

-5%

(0.1)

-

0.5

2.6

-5%

(0.1)

-

GBP

0.5

2.6

-5%

(0.1)

-

-

-

-5%

-

-

Cash and cash equivalents

   

 

    

 

EUR

3.3

14.6

-5%

(0.7)

-

9.7

41.2

-5%

(2.1)

-

USD

18.0

75.2

-5%

(3.8)

-

9.7

37.9

-5%

(1.9)

-

CHF

1.1

4.7

-5%

(0.2)

-

1.9

7.3

-5%

(0.4)

-

GBP

0.4

1.9

-5%

(0.1)

-

0.1

0.1

-5%

-

-

SEK

1.5

0.7

-5%

-

-

2.5

1.1

-5%

(0.1)

-

Senior Notes

    

 

    

 

EUR

-

-

-5%

-

-

(569.1)

(2,425.2)

-5%

121.3

-

USD

-

-

-5%

-

-

(524.2)

(2,045.0)

-5%

102.3

-

UMTS license liabilities

   

 

    

 

EUR

(157.2)

(695.5)

-5%

34.8

-

(180.6)

(769.6)

-5%

38.5

-

Trade payables

   

 

    

 

EUR

(5.1)

(22.6)

-5%

1.1

-

(3.6)

(15.3)

-5%

0.8

-

USD

(16.6)

(69.4)

-5%

3.5

-

(14.0)

(54.7)

-5%

2.7

-

XDR

(0.6)

(3.2)

-5%

0.2

 

(0.9)

(4.9)

-5%

0.2

-

CHF

-

-

-5%

-

-

(0.1)

(0.2)

-5%

-

-

Change in operating profit

  

32.4

-

   

257.6

-

Forwards

   

 

    

 

EUR

-

-

-5%

-

-

390.9

1,665.8

-5%

(83.3)

-

USD

-

-

-5%

-

-

482.1

1,880.7

-5%

(94.0)

-

Income tax   

(6.2)

-

   

(15.3)

-

Change in net profit

  

26.2

-

   

65.0

-

 

   20162015
 Estimated change in profit in PLNEstimated change in other comprehensive income in PLNEstimated change in profit in PLNEstimated change in other comprehensive income in PLN
Estimated change in exchange rate by 5 %    
EUR(27.5)-(59.2)-
USD1.0-(6.0)-
CHF0.2-0.3-
GBP0.2---
SEK----
XDR(0.1)-(0.1)-
Estimated change in exchange rate by -5 %    
EUR27.5-59.2-
USD(1.0)-6.0-
CHF(0.2)-(0.3)-
GBP(0.2)---
SEK----
XDR0.1-0.1-

Had Polish zloty strengthened 5% against the basket of currencies as at 31 December 2016 and 31 December 2015, the Group’s net profit would have decreased by PLN 26.2 and decreased by PLN 65.0, respectively and other comprehensive income would have been unchanged in 2016 and would have been unchanged in 2015. Had the Polish zloty weakened 5%, the Group’s net profit would have correspondingly increased by PLN 26.2 in 2016 and increased by PLN 65.0 in 2015 and other comprehensive income would have been unchanged in 2016 and would have been unchanged in 2015, assuming that all other variables remain constant. Estimated future revenue and costs denominated in foreign currencies are not taken into consideration.

Interest rate risk

Changes in market interest rates have no direct effect on the Group’s revenues, however, they do have an effect on net cash from operating activities due to interest earned on overnight bank deposits and current accounts, and on net cash from financing activities due to interest charged on bank loans and bonds.

The Group regularly analyses its level of interest rate risk exposure, including refinancing and risk minimising scenarios. Based on these analyses, the Group estimates the effects of changes in interest rates on its profit and loss.

In order to reduce interest rate risk exposure resulting from Parent’s interest payments on floating rate senior facility, the Group stipulated interest rate swaps for which hedge accounting was adopted (see note 29). In order to reduce interest rate risk exposure resulting from Metelem Holding Company Ltd. group interest payments on floating rate senior facilities the Group also uses interest rate swaps and for them hedge accounting was not adopted.

At the reporting date, the interest rate risk profile of interest-bearing financial instruments was:

 Carrying amount
 31 December 201631 December 2015
Fixed rate instruments  
Financial assets472.31,158.5
Financial liabilities*(860.3)(4,262.4)
Variable rate instruments  
Financial assets*909.8411.5
Financial liabilities*(11,668.2)(7,725.1)
Net interest exposure (11,146.4)(7,313.6)

* nominal debt

The Group classifies loan liabilities as variable rate instruments. Changes in the interest rate components do not result in a change in the carrying amount of the loan liability. The changes are reflected prospectively in the interest expense on loans and borrowings.

Cash flow sensitivity analysis for variable rate instruments (pre-tax effect):

 Income statementOther comprehensive incomeEquity
 Increase by 100 bpDecrease by 100 bpIncrease by 100 bpDecrease by 100 bpIncrease by 100 bpDecrease by 100 bp
31 December 2016 
Variable rate instruments*(107.6)107.63.7(3.7)(103.9)103.9
Cash flow sensitivity (net)(107.6)107.63.7(3.7)(103.9)103.9
31 December 2015      
Variable rate instruments*(73.1)73.16.6(6.6)(66.5)66.5
Cash flow sensitivity (net)(73.1)73.16.6(6.6)(66.5)66.5

* include sensitivity in fair value changes of hedging instruments (interest rate swaps) due to changes in interest rates

For some instruments the Group applies cash flow hedge model under IAS 39 for interest rate exposure from floating rate interest payments in PLN on senior facility hedged by interest rate swap.

Fair value vs. carrying amount

The Group uses the following hierarchy for determining and disclosing the fair value of financial instruments by valuation technique:

  • Level 1: quoted (unadjusted) prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
  • Level 2: other techniques for which all inputs which have a significant effect on the recorded fair value are observable, either directly or indirectly
  • Level 3: techniques which use inputs that have a significant effect on the recorded fair value that are not based on observable market data

Presented below are fair values and carrying amounts of financial assets and liabilities not measured in fair value.

31 December 201631 December 2015
 Category according to IAS 39The level of the fair value hierarchyFair valueCarrying amountFair valueCarrying amount
Loans grantedA253.051.850.747.9
Trade and other receivablesA*2,008.92,008.91,729.01,729.0
Cash and cash equivalents and short-term depositsA*1,326.01,326.01,512.01,512.0
Restricted cashA*10.710.711.711.7
Loans and borrowingsC2(10,651.7)(10,572.7)(6,733.1)(6,610.7)
Issued bondsC1,2**(2,076.3)(1,878.1)(5,773.0)(5,752.0)
UMTS licence liabilitiesC2(755.4)(695.5)(836.6)(769.8)
Finance lease liabilitiesC2(25.8)(25.9)(25.2)(25.2)
AccrualsC*(706.4)(706.4)(594.5)(594.5)
Trade and other payables and depositsC*(586.0)(586.0)(540.6)(540.6)
Total  (11,403.0)(11,067.2)(11,199.6)(10,992.2)
Unrecognized gain/(loss)   (335.8) (207.4)

A – loans and receivables
B – hedges
C – other liabilities
* It is assumed that the fair value of these financial assets and liabilities is equal to their nominal value, therefore no evaluation methods were used in order to calculate their fair value
** As at 31 December 2016, bonds issued by Cyfrowy Polsat are included in level 1 of the fair value hierarchy whereas bonds issued by Litenite are included in level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. As at 31 December 2015, bonds issued by Cyfrowy Polsat are included in level 1 of the fair value hierarchy whereas bonds issued by Polkomtel are included in level 2 of the fair value hierarchy

When determining the fair value of finance lease liabilities, forecasted cash flows from the reporting date to assumed dates of lease agreements termination were analyzed. The discount rate for each payment was calculated as a WIBOR interest rate plus a margin regarding the Group’s credit risk.

Trade and other receivables, trade and other payables and deposits comprise mainly receivables and payables which will be settled no later than at the end of the first month after the reporting date. It was therefore assumed that the effect of their valuation, taking into account the time value of money, would approximately be equal to their nominal value.

When determining the fair value of UMTS license liability, forecasted cash flows from the reporting date to September 2022 were discounted at EURIBOR market rate.

When determining the fair value of loans granted, forecasted cash flows from the reporting date to assumed dates of repayments of the loans were analyzed. The discount rate for each payment was calculated as an applicable WIBOR interest rate plus a margin regarding the credit risk.

As at 31 December 2016 and 31 December 2015 loans and borrowings comprised senior facilities. The discount rate for each payment was calculated as a sum of implied WIBOR interest rate and a margin regarding the Group’s credit risk. When determining the fair value of senior facilities as at 31 December 2016 and 31 December 2015, forecasted cash flows from the reporting date to 21 September 2020 (assumed dates of repayment of the loans) were analyzed.

The fair value of issued bonds as at December 31, 2016 was estimated as a last purchase price at the balance sheet date according to GPW Catalyst quotations for bonds issued by Cyfrowy Polsat S.A. Fair value of Litenite bonds was estimated according to generally accepted valuation model based on discounted cash flow analysis while the most significant batch data is interest rate reflecting customers credit risks.

As at 31 December 2016, the Group held the following financial instruments carried at fair value on the statement of financial position.

Assets measured at fair value  
 31 December 2016Level 1Level 2Level 3
Derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments:   
Interest rate swaps -14.7-
Hedging derivative instruments:    
Interest rate swaps -1.5-
Total -16.2-

The fair value of forwards and interest rate swaps is determined using financial instruments valuation models, based on generally published currency exchange rates, interest rates, forward rate curves and volatility curves for foreign currencies taken from active markets. Fair value of derivatives is determined based on the discounted future cash flows from transactions, calculated based on the difference between the forward price and the transaction price.

As at 31 December 2015, the Group held the following financial instruments measured at fair value:

Assets measured at fair value  
 31 December 2015Level 1Level 2Level 3
Derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments:   
Forwards -10.5-
Interest rate swaps -6.9-
Total -17.4-
Liabilities measured at fair value  
 31 December 2015Level 1Level 2Level 3
Derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments:   
Forwards -(33.3)-
Interest rate swaps -(31.3)-
Hedging derivative instruments:    
Interest rate swaps -(8.3)-
Total -(72.9)-

Items of income, costs, profit and losses recognized in profit or loss generated by loans and bonds (including hedging transactions)

For the period from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2016Loans and borrowingsBondsHedging instrumentsDerivative instruments not designated as hedging instrumentsTotal
Interest expense on loans and borrowings(401.7)-(7.3)(10.3)(419.3)
Interest expense on bonds-(141.7)-(218.3)(360.0)
Foreign exchange rate differences-(244.8)--(244.8)
Total finance costs(401.7)(386.5)(7.3)(228.6)(1,024.1)
Total gross profit/(loss)(401.7)(386.5)(7.3)(228.6)(1,024.1)
Hedge valuation reserve--(9.8)-(9.8)
For the period from 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2015Loans and borrowingsBondsHedging instrumentsTotal
Interest expense on loans and borrowings(396.4)-(7.8)(404.2)
Interest expense on bonds-(371.4)-(371.4)
Early redemption costs-(244.8)-(244.8)
Cumulative catch-up-616.2-616.2
Foreign exchange rate differences-(223.6)-(223.6)
Total finance costs(396.4)(223.6)(7.8)(627.8)
Total gross profit/(loss)(396.4)(223.6)(7.8)(627.8)
Hedge valuation reserve--(6.6)(6.6)

Hedge accounting and derivatives

Cash Flow Hedge of interest rate risk of interest payments

At 31 December 2016, the Group held a number of interest rate swaps not designated as hedges in order to reduce the risk of floating interest payments on senior facilities denominated in PLN.

Table below presents the basic parameters of IRS not designated as hedging instruments, including the periods in which cash flows occur, periods they will affect the financial results and their fair value in PLN as at the balance sheet date.

 31 December 2016 31 December 2015
Type of instrumentInterest rate swapInterest rate swap
ExposureFloating rate interest payments in PLNFloating rate interest payments in PLN
Hedged riskInterest rate riskInterest rate risk
Notional value of hedging instrument3,000.04,972.0
Fair value of hedging instruments14.6(24.4)
Hedge accounting approachHedge accounting not adoptedHedge accounting not adopted
Expected period the hedge item affect income statementUntil 30 September 2019Until 28 September 2018

At 31 December 2016, the Group held a number of interest rate swaps designated as hedges of floating interest payments on senior facility denominated in PLN. The interest rate swaps are being used to hedge the interest rate risk of the Group’s floating rate financing in PLN.

The terms of the interest rate swaps have been negotiated to match the terms of the floating rate financing in PLN. There were no highly probable transactions for which hedge accounting has been claimed that have not occurred and no significant element of hedge ineffectiveness requiring recognition in the income statement.

Table below presents the basic parameters of IRS designated as hedging instruments, including the periods in which cash flows occur due to cash flow hedges, periods they will affect the financial results and fair value in PLN of hedging instruments as at the balance sheet date.

 31 December 2016 31 December 2015
Type of instrumentInterest rate swapInterest rate swap
ExposureFloating rate interest payments in PLNFloating rate interest payments in PLN
Hedged riskInterest rate riskInterest rate risk
Notional value of hedging instrument250.0975.0
Fair value of hedging instruments1.5(8.3)
Hedge accounting approachCash Flow HedgeCash Flow Hedge
Expected period the hedge item affect income statementUntil 30 September 2018Until 31 December 2016

Change in fair value of cash flow hedges is presented below (pre-tax):

 20162015
Opening Balance(8.3)(15.4)
Effective part of gains or losses on the hedging instrument1.5(0.6)
Reclassification to instruments for which hedge accounting is not adopted-0.1
Early settlement--
Amounts recognized in equity transferred to the profit and loss statement, of which:8.37.6
adjustment of interest costs8.37.6
adjustment due to inefficiency of the hedge relationships--
Closing Balance1.5(8.3)

Cash Flow Hedge of foreign exchange risk of interest payments

At 31 December 2015 the Group held a number of forwards not designated as hedges in order to reduce the risk of interest payments on EUR- and USD-denominated bonds.

Tables below present the basic parameters of forwards not designated as hedging instruments, including the periods in which cash flows occur, periods they will affect the financial results and their fair value in PLN as at the balance sheet date.

 31 December 2016 31 December 2015
Type of instrument-Forward
Exposure-Interest payments in euro
Hedged risk-Foreign exchange risk
Notional value of hedging instrument (EUR)-381.9
Fair value of hedging instruments-0.2
Hedge accounting approach-Hedge accounting not adopted
Expected period the hedge item affect income statement-Until 27 January 2016
 31 December 2016 31 December 2015
Type of instrument-Forward
Exposure-Interest payments in American dollars
Hedged risk-Foreign exchange risk
Notional value of hedging instrument (EUR)-479.1
Fair value of hedging instruments-(23.2)
Hedge accounting approach-Hedge accounting not adopted
Expected period the hedge item affect income statement-Until 27 January 2016

Cash Flow Hedge of foreign exchange risk of operational payments

At 31 December 2015 the Group held a number of forwards not designated as hedges in order to reduce the risk of operational payments in EUR and USD.

Tables below present the basic parameters of forwards not designated as hedging instruments, including the periods in which cash flows occur, periods they will affect the financial results and their fair value in PLN as at the balance sheet date.

 31 December 2016 31 December 2015
Type of instrument-Forward
Exposure-Operational payments in euro
Hedged risk-Foreign exchange risk
Notional value of hedging instrument (EUR)-9.0
Fair value of hedging instruments-0.1
Hedge accounting approach-Hedge accounting not adopted
Expected period the hedge item affect income statement-Until 18 March 2016
 31 December 2016 31 December 2015
Type of instrument-Forward
Exposure-Operational payments in American dollars
Hedged risk-Foreign exchange risk
Notional value of hedging instrument (EUR)-3.0
Fair value of hedging instruments-0.1
Hedge accounting approach-Hedge accounting not adopted
Expected period the hedge item affect income statement-Until 18 March 2016